|
|
Post by Klaus Schüßler on May 16, 2009 19:11:31 GMT -8
We need a name to describe us when we do local displays and events.
Klaus
|
|
nolareenactor
member
And at this range, I'm a real Frederick Zoller
Posts: 208
|
Post by nolareenactor on May 16, 2009 19:21:06 GMT -8
I like 1944, but it should be 1944 Historical Group.
|
|
|
|
Post by Klaus Schüßler on May 16, 2009 20:44:15 GMT -8
good suggestion I like 1944, but it should be 1944 Historical Group. |
|
nolareenactor
member
And at this range, I'm a real Frederick Zoller
Posts: 208
|
Post by nolareenactor on May 17, 2009 10:23:05 GMT -8
Do you guys still have the sign from the Battle of the Bulge tactical?
|
|
|
|
Post by AG1944 on May 17, 2009 11:18:47 GMT -8
Do you guys still have the sign from the Battle of the Bulge tactical? Yeah, I still have them. |
|
|
|
Post by Klaus Schüßler on May 20, 2009 19:43:56 GMT -8
More votes?
|
|
|
|
Post by Redeye on May 21, 2009 10:07:49 GMT -8
Can I vote again?  |
|
|
|
Post by norseman on May 26, 2009 22:31:23 GMT -8
I think the title:
Inland Northwest Living History Association
Implies your going to cover everything from Revolutionary war to Vietnam. If that's your plan? Cool. If it's not then it needs a tighter definition in the title.
my .02 cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrsparkle on May 27, 2009 10:22:41 GMT -8
I think the title: Inland Northwest Living History Association Implies your going to cover everything from Revolutionary war to Vietnam. If that's your plan? Cool. If it's not then it needs a tighter definition in the title. my .02 cents. I like the more general name. If we get this up and running we sound more inclusive to those who are into Vietnam, Civil War, etc. Then we can convert them to WW2. |
|
|
|
Post by AG1944 on May 27, 2009 19:33:05 GMT -8
So Klaus, should we end the vote and take the name that has won or re-hash this at the next meeting in June?
Thoughts and opinions? Anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by Klaus Schüßler on May 27, 2009 20:07:30 GMT -8
I am happy to go with the winner, or we can wait until the next meeting, your call. Klaus So Klaus, should we end the vote and take the name that has won or re-hash this at the next meeting in June? Thoughts and opinions? Anyone? |
|
|
|
Post by norseman on May 27, 2009 23:26:42 GMT -8
I think the title: Inland Northwest Living History Association Implies your going to cover everything from Revolutionary war to Vietnam. If that's your plan? Cool. If it's not then it needs a tighter definition in the title. my .02 cents. I like the more general name. If we get this up and running we sound more inclusive to those who are into Vietnam, Civil War, etc. Then we can convert them to WW2. Understood. Hey..........we may even convert you!  |
|
|
|
Post by Redeye on May 28, 2009 9:40:46 GMT -8
I agree with Wade, we should pin this down to reflect the WW2 angle. Maybe we should hash this out at the June meeting and try and get as many of us there for input as possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Klaus Schüßler on Jun 21, 2009 9:24:00 GMT -8
The powers have decided on a name finally. "Inland Northwest WW2 Living History Group" or in short just "WW2 Living History Group"
We wanted a name to identify our region, our interest and our method. The others names were all very well liked, but it was decided that a less specific name may cause some confusion. We also wanted to distance ourselves to some degree from the other period reenactors and thus avoid conflict.
Expect a new forum and a new web site soon. Feel free to cause dissent now, its your last chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Redeye on Jun 21, 2009 11:39:25 GMT -8
Good deal! That sounds great!
|
|
